Wednesday 19 February 2014

Televising the courts: Real life crime drama


Have you always wondered what the inside of a court looked like and how important cases were heard? Well, live broadcasting from the Court of Appeal is now on TV.

Launched from a control desk within the court of appeal itself it is hoped that the televised appeals will increase transparency and improve understanding of the UK court system. Currently only civil or criminal appeals are broadcast - not appeals against conviction due to the chance of a retrial.

Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales has said that,
"We believe it will help assist understanding of the way in which the courts work and enable the public to see the way justice is delivered in an even more open and transparent manner than at present."

How it works

Only one case will be filmed at a given time despite many being heard, and this case will be chosen by four newsgatherers and the permission giving judge. Due to a mobile set up the equipment can be moved from any of the 15 courtrooms to another with ease.

The man in charge is video-journalist, Matt Nicholls. He will control the cameras and decide which parts (if not all) should be televised. The project is funded by four press giants to which Nicholls must report: The BBC, Sky News, ITN and the Press Association. The PA will provide the clips which will appear on newspaper websites.

So, when we say the broadcasts are live that isn’t strictly true, but near enough. There will be a 70 second delay in the airing so that any sensitive information can be omitted. These details could include:
·         Swearing and other profanities
·         Court order protected or unreportable information
·         Images of individuals who should not be shown such as the witness or appellant

One of the many reasons why video equipment has not been allowed into court before includes its obtrusive nature but thanks to a streamline design by Sky News the equipment is almost unnoticeable. Bespoke and made to camouflage within its Victorian wood surroundings, the recording equipment is placed on a tea-trolley like a piece of furniture while cameras are placed on the surrounding bookshelves.   

Another issue has been the rules on photography in court. It has been an offence to take photographs of participants in a court of England and Wales precinct since 1925. Although technically security cameras break this law. With these new television broadcasts a wide shot of the courtroom will be used as well as shots of the lawyer or judge who is speaking at the time. However any witness testimonials will be reported without showing their faces in order to maintain anonymity.

Of course these rules only apply in England and Wales, whilst Scotland have been televising criminal cases for nearly two decades.

The future of televised courts

Televised court cases were first recommended nearly 25 years ago by a committee of barristers chaired by Jonathon Caplan QC. However after the highly publicised murder case of OJ Simpson across the pond in America in 1994 which was broadcast worldwide, the recommendation was postponed.

Now a quarter of a century later the suggestion has materialised again and if successful may extend to broadcasting sentencing remarks following trials in the Crown Court.
TV companies would love to get into the Crown Court as with high profile cases comes the chance of salacious or sensational stories. It would make great TV with a real sense of drama. We must remember however that this isn’t done for good viewing TV but rather to give insight into a real life process.

This televised version would be edited and key moments would be publicised possibly creating a ‘distortion of reality’. TV companies often want the most celebrity-ridden or action packed cases and therefore a chosen selection of pieces may make a case seem more extreme than it is.

What do you think about televised cases at the Court of Appeal? Is it a good thing or too intrusive?